dc.description.abstract |
Landslide susceptibility assessment is done based on three different
approaches viz., Physical modelling, Statistical methods and Geomechanical methods.
This is achieved through integration and manipulation of data using Geographic
Information System (GIS) supplemented by other modes of computing and execution.
A test area of 84km is selected in Garhwal Himalayan region covering two
catchments of river Alkananda.
Physical modelling involved two simulation programs in C++ programming
language to determine rockfall velocity and runout zone estimation respectively. GIS
is extensively used in data generation, visualization and interpretation for both the
models. Simulation programs are formulated applying different conditions on the
basic principle of potential influence of gravitational pull on a falling rock mass at a
point, with respect to a point at relatively higher position. The first model estimated
rockfall velocity considering all points of higher elevation as source points. The
second model uses aspect based slope unit criteria to calculate rockfall velocity as
well as estimate the runout zone. The first model estimated velocity in the range of 0
ms" at highest point tol80 ms"' in the valley floor. Abrupt change in velocity gradient
is evident in isolated patches in the catchment owing to friction dependent variable
incorporated in the model. The second model is treated separately for existing and
potential source points and found to efficiently evaluate the physical process of
rockfall in the catchment.
The second approach is based on statistical methods. It is attempted through
four different techniques utilizing GIS potential for raster based analysis. The first
two methods namely, Information Value (Info Val) and Frequency Ratio (FR) are
pixel based analysis involving statistics of different ratios of landslide pixel in
parameter class, pixel count of each class domain and frequency of each class in the
whole area. The third method, Certainty Factor (CF) is also based on landslide and
class frequencies for estimating the probability of landslide occurrence in each pixel.
Individual class CF's are combined based on certain rules to generate a susceptibility
map by zoning the area under six predefined categories. The fourth method, Logistic
Regression (LR) is a multivariate statistical technique which incorporates landslide
densities under each class of parameters in a logit transformation equation to estimate
the range of probability of landslide occurrence at each pixel. The first, second and
fourth methods give a range of values in the output and hence is categorized into
preferred susceptibility classes. The output of the third method falls in any of the six
predefined susceptibility categories estimated at each pixel. The first two highest
susceptibility classes in all the four analyses invariably account for the high count of
landslide pixels irrespective of techniques. These four different methods are compared
and validated. Out of the four methods, the highest value of confidence is found in the
use of Certainty Factor.
The third and final approach is based on GIS based assessment of
geomechanical properties of rock slopes. It is addressed through analysis of two
methodologies. The first method is aimed at analysis of slope failures in a small
catchment in relation to the dip and azimuth of discontinuity and topographic slope.
Dip and azimuth of discontinuity set is analysed with that of topographic slope to
identify pixels falling in identical ranges. The output is a presentation of potential
failure surface which is compared with the existing landslide map through proximity
analysis. A very good relation could be established between the existing slope failures
and the potential failure points. The second technique, Slope Mass Rating (SMR)
based Geomechanical modelling is built on empirically established ratings of various
categories in different parameters of rock mass classification. The ratings are
incorporated in GIS through raster based analysis for slope stability assessment along
a road section in the catchment. The resulting map is categorized by dividing the
SMR values equally in to five classes. A good correlation is found between the failed
slope faces and the low SMR values. |
en_US |