dc.description.abstract |
Man has been exposed to the hardships of earthquakes since the ancient times
and due to impossibility to avoid them, he has learnt how to protect himself by
improving his construction methods. Broadly speaking, there are two design
philosophies for protecting buildings against earthquakes. The first, and most
popular, consists in making the building sufficiently strong and ductile, so that it
can withstand the earthquake loads without essential damage. The second
method incorporates passive or active protection with the aid of various systems
used to control the transmission of earthquake shocks to the building and thus
reducing the seismic stress occurring in the building.
In recent years, application of seismic base isolation has been getting
widespread acceptance for protection of buildings from earthquake forces. The
concept is based on structural control method which involves in reducing the
demand. Behaviour and effectiveness of base-isolated buildings involves several
aspects such as frequency characteristics of input base motion, type of isolating
device, design parameters of the isolation system, building type and soil
conditions.
Available literature in the area of seismic base isolation of multistorey buildings is
reviewed. Various investigators have performed studies covering various aspects
of base isolation such as development of isolator for different design
requirements, analytical modelling of their load-deflection behaviour,
experimental verification of the analytical models, earthquake simulation testing
of base-isolated building models by shake tables, analytical modelling of baseisolated
buildings, retrofitting schemes for historical buildings using seismic base
isolations, performance of base-isolated buildings in real earthquakes etc.
Though base isolation has become popular for buildings of post earthquake
importance such as hospitals, communication centres, police stations etc., there
are still some issues and gap areas in this approach that need further research
and development for its wider application. Afew of these areas have been
selected for this study. Behaviour of seismic base isolation of moderate height
and tall buildings for different types of base motions has been investigated. The
study is conducted in two parts viz. experimental and analytical.
The experimental study consists in determining the load-deflection behaviour of
laminated rubber bearings which are later used to isolate athree storey one sixth
scale reinforced concrete building model. This model is tested under quasi-static
loading and for free vibration and harmonic base excitation. The results obtained
by analytical models have been compared with the experimental results to verify
the accuracy of the analytical models. These analytical models of rubber
bearings are later used for analytical study of moderate height and tall buildings.
The quasi-static shear tests on rubber bearings gives the stiffness and damping
characteristics of the bearings. It is observed that the bearings used in the study
possess low damping. Horizontal stiffness and damping shows decreasing trend
with increase in shear strain though the rate of decrease is low. The stable
hysteresis loop for number of cycles verifies the suitability of rubber bearings,
under earthquake type loading. Quasi-static tests on base-isolated model show
that superstructure of base-isolated building behaves like a rigid block. The
horizontal stiffness of the building is more or less equal to the combined stiffness
of isolators provided in the isolation system. Comparison of responses of fixedbase
and base-isolated model under harmonic base excitation shows that base
isolation with rubber bearings is very effective for high frequency base motions
which are filtered due to presence of rubber bearings. Response of the model,
considering it as afull scale building, is also computed analytically by modelling
the load-deflection behaviour of rubber bearings as (i) combination of linear
elastic and viscous damping element and (ii) hysteretic element respectively.
The parameters of these elements are taken from the results of quasi-static tests
of rubber bearings. Experimental and analytical responses are compared and
found to be in close agreement.
Analysis of base-isolated buildings is a complex problem due to non-linear
behaviour of isolation devices. Several structural analysis and finite element
analysis softwares, then available, have been used by different authors in the
past. These softwares, in some conditions do not give sufficiently precise results
or even fail to analyse the base-isolated buildings. Available software 3D-BASISTABS
is found suitable to conduct the analytical study performed in this thesis.
The programme assumes superstructure to be elastic and non linearity to be
concentrated in the isolation system only. Elements are available in the
programme for modelling elastomeric and sliding type bearings. Two reinforced
concrete buildings of four and six storeys respectively are analyzed for the study
of moderate height buildings.
It is well known that in the region of rock or stiff soil, fundamental frequency of
conventional moderate height buildings generally fall in the range where the
earthquake energy is maximum. Due to quasi-resonance condition, the building
attracts substantial earthquake energy. Therefore base isolation is very
promising and effective alternative technique for moderated height buildings.
Effectiveness of base isolation for these buildings is studied for earthquakes of
different characteristics. Effect of bearing parameters such as damping, post-topre
yield stiffness ratio and yield-force is studied for these buildings. Amount of
damping in isolation system plays a very important role in controlling the seismic
response of base-isolated buildings, particularly the base displacement. The
seismic response decreases with increase in isolation damping but beyond a
certain value called as optimum damping, higher mode participation starts
affecting significantly the total response of the base-isolated buildings. Value of
optimum damping in isolation system is observed to be mainly depending on the
frequency characteristics of the input earthquake motion and is low for
earthquakes having high dominant frequencies.
Several types of isolators have been developed till now but only few viz. low
damping rubber bearings, filled rubber bearings, Teflon-steel sliding bearings
VI1
and Friction pendulum system (FPS) have been developed to the stage of
practical application. Suitability of these isolators for different conditions is not
very well defined and is studied for different type of earthquake motions. Though
these isolators are in general observed to be effective in reducing seismic
response of moderate height buildings but their effectiveness depends on
different design requirements. Rubber bearings are most suitable for high
frequency motions while friction type isolators may also be suitable for sites
where base motion can have low frequency contents. The buildings with
sophisticated electronic equipment and loose contents should preferably be
isolated with rubber bearings to avoid transmission of high frequencies to the
superstructure. In case of low gap between the adjacent buildings or where, for
some reasons, it is not possible to provide large seismic gaps, the FPS type
isolators are more suitable.
Base isolation method of earthquake resistant design is based on the philosophy
that the fundamental period of building is lengthened beyond the range of
dominant frequencies of input base motion. The period of isolation commonly
adopted is 2.0sec. Tall buildings would already have higher periods and
therefore it was earlier thought that base isolation may not be feasible for tall
buildings. Three buildings of 10, 14 and 20 storeys, referred as tall buildings in
this study, are analyzed to investigate the effectiveness of base isolation for
different types of earthquake motions. Base isolation system is considered as
combination of low damping rubber bearings and external dampers. It is
observed that base isolation results in slight decrease of seismic response but is
not feasible for the unstiffened tall buildings. There seems to be a possibility of
increasing the effectiveness of base isolation for tall buildings by stiffening their
superstructure. The stiffening may result in low fixed-base period and such
buildings, if base-isolated may develop smaller seismic response. Another
method that can increase the effectiveness of base isolation for tall buildings
may be by increasing damping in the superstructure which can dampen the
higher mode response. Further increase in the flexibility of base isolation system
Vlll
may also enhance the effectiveness of base isolation for such buildings. These
three strategies are explored in this study.
It is observed that base isolation is effective for stiffened tall buildings.
Effectiveness is more for high frequency base motions. Stiffening of
superstructure of base-isolated building is beneficial in reducing the floor
accelerations and interstorey drifts. In case of base-isolated tall buildings, the
increase of damping in superstructure from 2% to 20% reduces its seismic
response except the base displacement which remains more or less constant.
The reduction is more for base-isolated buildings with unstiffened superstructure
as compared to that with stiffened superstructure. The effect of increase of
damping in reducing the seismic response is not very significant due to lesser
participation of higher modes.
Increase in the time period of isolation system from 2.0sec to 3.0sec increases
the effectiveness of base isolation for tall buildings. Increased flexibility of
isolation system generally makes base isolation feasible for unstiffened tall
buildings while further increase the effectiveness of buildings with stiffened
superstructure. Effect of base isolation for the buildings with fixed-base period
close to isolation period is also studied. Base isolation reduces the response of
such buildings also but the reduction is not significant. The base isolation of
buildings with fixed-base period close to 2.0sec can be made feasible by using
isolation system with period of 3.0sec. |
en_US |