Abstract:
Seismic Hazard in India is due to the earthquakes originating from movement of
plates in Himalayan region. Since, forces due to the resultant collision have not been
fully neutralized, Himalayan mountain range is still rising and providing potential
source of earthquakes in Northern India. Seismic activity in Southern India is
believed to be due to intraplate fault movements. Structural Engineering contributes
in mitigating this hazard on fronts such as optimum estimation of expected
earthquake levels, formulating the engineering design criteria for structures and other
facilities, formulation and implementation ofconstruction practices which result in to
safe and economical structures. Due to limitations on resources, the aspect of safety
and economy ofstructures is very important for developing countries like India.
Development ofseismic design practices can be seen in its evolution from a simple
specification of designing buildings for lateral load of 10 %of weight of the building
to the recent form of Performance Based Seismic Design (PBSD). Lessons learnt
from the past earthquakes have greatly contributed in this development. US trend of
development ofseismic design specifications is reflecting in Codes ofPractices of
many countries including India. However, there is major obstacle in implementing
the design methodology in ATC and FEMA documents outside US, due to inherent
differences in seismicity, types of construction materials, types of structural systems
in use, and design and construction practices in vogue in an individual country.
Present work deals with exploring the potential ofPBSD and elements needed for its
use in India. Most buildings in India are four storied, buildings with five to ten floors
u
can be grouped as few, while those having more than ten stories are rare. Among
these multistoried buildings, use of steel frames and concrete shear walls is still rare.
Therefore, majority of framed buildings in India can be classified as low to medium
rise reinforced concrete (RC) moment resisting framed (MRF) buildings. Earthquake
Damage Survey Reports show that the seismic damage in Indian urban areas is
mainly due to the RC, MRF buildings under residential occupancy. Therefore,
among the various types ofstructural systems used in India, RC, MRF type is chosen
for present studies.
Research work aiming at evaluating and evolving a design methodology attain wide
parametric scope. Present work is divided in four major sections which includes
studies related to:
(i) Relevance of available PBSD guidelines for use in India.
(ii) Consideration of modeling guidelines in PBSD procedures and Indian Code
based procedure.
(iii) Investigations for adequacy ofcurrent Indian Code design provisions.
(iv) Exploring possibility of improving current design provisions using available
PBSD methodology.
Accordingly, attempts are made in this work to understand the differences in
seismicity of India and that of US. Regarding guidelines for modeling of structural
systems, specifications for modeling of RC elements given by ATC, FEMA and
available literature are studied. Major finding of this study is that modeling
guidelines for linear analysis and design are not very different in these documents
and practice in India but for nonlinear analysis which forms the core of PBSD, there
in
is absence of experimental data from Indian side. Fortunately literature is available
for experimental investigation of brick masonry infilled RC frames in India. It is
found that the analytical behaviour of brick masonry infills in India is much different
than the behaviour reported in FEMA and other documents based on research in
western countries. On account of this difference, a detailed study carried out in
present work for infilled RC frames has resulted in arriving at material model and
component behaviour model for brick masonry in India. Proposed models are
validated using the experimental data from India. It is found that investigations
carried out are able to explain the field performance of infilled frames in India.
Studies for alternatives to obtain candidate structures for nonlinear analysis in PBSD
indicate the importance of preliminary design. Literature review in this aspect shows
that structure designed on the basis of codal provisions provide most appropriate
candidate structures. This helped to evaluate the performance of Indian code
compliant buildings. On the basis of comparative studies for codal provisions,
inconsistencies in Indian codes could be identified. These are addressed through
comparison with similar provisions from codes of other countries as well as through
design exercise carried out in present study.
Preliminary studies for implementation of PBSD methodology for code designed
buildings pointed out that result for evaluation using nonlinear analysis are
dependent on codal procedures of force based analysis and design for assumed
values of Response Reduction Factor, R. This being inconsistent with principles of
PBSD, necessitated in depth evaluation for response reduction factor applicable for
Indian buildings. It is found that the constituents of response reduction factor R, viz.,
iv
Case studies for performance evaluation in accordance with ATC and FEMA
specifications for buildings designed using seismic design criteria in Indian Code
show that methodology used in this research is useful to provide the elements
necessary for implementation ofPBSD in India.
Using the proposed energy based ductility it is proved that any general forcedisplacement
curve can be represented in elasto-perfectly-plastic (EPP) form that can
be considered as an equivalent representation of the original form for the purpose of
computing the ductility factor. This equivalence is then used to propose two methods
called as, Energy-Ductility Based Response Reduction Methods (EDBRRM) as
replacements for the Capacity Spectrum Method of ATC 40. These methods utilize
the well-established equal-energy principle in the constant acceleration region of the
Elastic Design Response Spectra (EDRS) and the equal-displacement principle in the
constant velocity region of the EDRS. These principles have been used traditionally
to compute the Inelastic Design Response Spectra for elasto-perfectly plastic
behavior of single degree of freedom systems. It is expected that the proposed
Energy-Ductility Based Response Reduction Methods will be used for computing the
inelastic demand in Nonlinear Pushover Analyses Methods ofPBSD of future dates.