Abstract:
A seismic risk assessment methodology, based on socio-economic clustering of urban
housing stock, is presented in this Thesis. The methodology is particularly useful for
Indian cities, where comprehensive building stock databases are not available, and a
natural division of the city, in a number of clusters with different socio-economic
levels, exists. The seismic risk parameters are assumed to be uniform within a socio
economic cluster. The methodology is based on an optimum utilization of high
resolution satellite data and a Stratified Random Sample Survey. Ten different classes
of socio-economic clusters found in Indian cities are defined and 34 Model Building
Types (MBTs) prevalent on the Indian subcontinent have been identified. Seismic
vulnerability of the proposed MBTs has been assessed by comparing with the
classifications of MSK64, EMS98, PSI and HAZUS. Lower and upperboundDamage
Probability Matrices (DPMs) are proposed based on the MSK and EMS scales and
experiences of past earthquakes in India. The DPMs based on PSI have also been
evaluated.
Two analytical models, based on equivalent frame approach, are presented, which
automatically simulate the effect ofvariation ofaxial forces in piers. The models have
been validated for results of two walls, studied in the 'Catania Project'. An exercise
has also been carried outto select representative building plans based onthe statistical
analysis of plans of 32 buildings selected randomly from field survey. The seismic
behaviour of the representative buildings has been simulated using one of the
proposed models and Capacity Spectra have been developed for URM buildings, in
mud, lime and cement mortars, representing typical north Indian construction.
Fragility Curves have been developed using the variabilities defined in HAZUS.
in
Intensity based DPMs have been obtained from the developed Fragility Curves and
compared with the other DPMs, and damage data of Bhuj earthquake. It has been
observed that Bhuj earthquake damage data is much more scattered than that
predicted by MSK, EMS, PSI scales, and the analytical simulation. The damage
predicted by the analytical simulation is higher than that predicted by PSI scale, but
lower than that observed during Bhuj earthquake.
The developed methodology is demonstrated through a case study of a typical north
Indian city of Dehradun, located in the foothills of Himalayas. DPMs based onMSK
and EMS-98 scales, and PSI scale, have been used to assign the vulnerability of the
building stock. The risk scenario of the city has been generated for the seismic
intensity (MSK VIII) assigned by Indian seismic macrozonation map. The risk
estimates using the two sets of DPMs, have been compared. At moderate intensities,
the two estimates are in fair agreement, but, at lowand high intensities, the estimates
based on PSI scale are more reasonable as the descriptive scales saturate at these
intensities. The distribution of seismic risk across different socio-economic clusters
has been studied and it has been observed that poorer people are subjected to higher
seismic risk, both, in terms of casualties, and in terms of economic losses.
Limitations and assumptions in the case study have been discussed elaborately and
different sources of uncertainty have been identified. In the absence of adequate
information on each of the components of risk, it is concluded that the risk estimates
obtained in the case study are to be considered only as a coarse indicator of the
perceived seismic risk.