Abstract:
Adverse effects are experienced when high river flows occur in the form of floods
causing loss of life and damage to property which have to be mitigated by employing
economically feasible structural measures such as levees, flood walls and channel
improvement. However, these types of measures cannot eliminate completely the
hydraulic risk, given the impossibility of building larger and larger structures to cope with
extremely low probability events. Therefore, an important role remains for non-structural
measures to be compared, evaluated and implemented in real-time. Flood forecasting is
an important non-structural measure for flood damage reduction and for minimizing
flood-related deaths and, hence, its implementation as an effective tool requires accurate
forecasting with sufficient lead-time. Therefore, it is essential that flood forecasting
methods should be physically based, less data intensive and, over and above, should be
easily understood by the field engineers for troubleshooting of the problems related to
these methods during real-time operation. Typically, the flood forecasting models have
two components: The deterministic flow component and the stochastic flow component.
While the former is determined by the hydrologic/hydraulic model, the latter is
determined based on the error series of the difference between the forecasted flow for a
specified lead-time and the corresponding observed one. The residual series reflects both
the model error, due to the inability of the deterministic model to correctly reproduce the
flow process, and the observational error while measuring the flow. It is imperative,
therefore, to use an appropriate model to reduce the model error. The hydrometric databased
flood forecasting model studied herein is employed for forecasting flood for a
given lead-time at a gauging station knowing the evolving flood hydrograph at an
upstream gauging station without involving rainfall, the causative factor for runoff
generation. Accordingly, the deterministic model employed herein is the river routing
method.
The emphasis of this study is on the development of a routing procedure for the
application of a Variable Parameter Muskingum method, known as the Variable
Parameter McCarthy-Muskingum Discharge-routing (VPMMD) method which has been
directly derived from the Saint-Venant equations by Price and Perumal, [2011], for the
purpose of real-time flood forecasting in natural rivers under data deficient conditions,
especially the morphometric data. It is considered that the morphometric data of the river
reach required for the study is available only at the river gauging stations, where also the
rating curves are available. The proposed routing procedure using the VPMMD method
envisages the development of a reach-averaged rating curve for the river reach using the
rating curves available at the upstream and downstream ends of the study reach and the
development of the reach averaged cross-sectional geometrical elements information
using the cross-sections data available at both the reach ends. The parameters of the
VPMMD method required for channel routing are estimated based on these reachaveraged
rating curve and channel cross-section information. The routing parameters of
the VPMMD method are linked to the channel and flow characteristics which enable the
variation of these parameters at every routing time step. The routing procedure of the
VPMMD method employs the aforesaid reach averaged rating curve and channel crosssection
data supplied in the form of look-up tables for linking uniquely the normal flow
depth with the flow characteristics such as the normal discharge, the normal velocity and
the normal celerity, and with the geometrical elements such as the area and top width of
the reach-averaged flow section for determining the variable parameters of the routing
method. This routing procedure enables the routing of floods in hypothetical channels as
well as in natural rivers, covering the main channels as well as the floodplains. This
n
method is studied herein for its strengths and weaknesses by routing hypothetical inflow
hydrographs in two synthetic channels: 1) a natural river section look alike artificial
uniform channel as employed by Price [2009], and 2) a uniform compound channel
section reach consisting of main and floodplain trapezoidal section. While ten channel
types based on the former artificial sections were used for conducting numerical
experiments of the proposed routing approach, it was tested in 72 artificial channels of the
latter type. A number of hypothetical inflow hydrographs were routed through these
artificial channels using the VPMMD method based routing procedure described herein
and the solutions obtained were compared with the corresponding benchmark solutions of
the Saint-Venant equations. Successful simulations of the benchmark solutions using the
routing procedure formulated herein based on the VPMMD method demonstrate the
theoretical correctness of the VPMMD method as well as that of the suggested routing
procedure. These simulations also verified the ability of the VPMMD method to estimate
the stage hydrographs by closely reproducing the corresponding benchmark stage
hydrographs obtained from the solutions of the Saint-Venant equations. In addition to the
verification of the VPMMD method routing capability, the utility of the method for field
applications was also investigated by simulatingten past recorded flood events of a 15 km
reach between Pierantonia and Ponte Felcino stations of Tiber River in Central Italy. All
the ten events, except one could be reproduced with the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency
tj >99%, thus, demonstrating the immense usefulness of the method for routing floods in
river reaches.
It was considered appropriate to investigate the applicability limits of the VPMMD
routing method to bring out the practical limitations of the method. This was carried out
by simulating 11200 hypothetical routing solutions based on the Saint-Venant equations
and reproducing these 11200 benchmark solutions using the VPMMD method. This study
iii
reveals that the VPMMD method is able to produce 95% of successful simulations of the
discharge hydrograph solutions with 5% error in reproducing the pertinent characteristics
of the benchmark solutions. Based on the applicability limit estimation study, the
recommended criterion limit to be satisfied by the discharge hydrograph at the inlet of the
reach is (l/SA(dy/dx) <0.57, and for similar successful simulation of the benchmark
stage hydrographs only, the criterion limit to be satisfied is (l/S0)(dy/dx) <0.61.
These range of applicability limits of the VPMMD method brings out the immense
practical usefulness of the VPMMD method. The reach-averaged channel flow and the
cross-sectional information required for the estimation of the routing parameters of the
VPMMD method was supplied in the tabular form by relating the flow depth uniquely
with the discharge, velocity and the celerity, and the top width of the flow section. No inbetween
channel section information was used in the developed routing procedure which
enables the channel routing between the upstream inflow section and the downstream
outflow section, and enabling routing through the main and floodplain sections of the
channel reach. Considering the practical usefulness of this routing procedure developed
using the VPMMD method, a Variable Parameter McCarthy-Muskingum Discharge Real
time Flood-Forecasting (VPMMDRF) method is developed using the VPMMD method as
a component model of a hydrometric data-based deterministic forecasting model for real
time flood forecasting, particularly considering routing through multiple sub reaches of a
river reach. A two parameter autoregressive forecast error estimation model forms the
other component of the VPMMDRF method. Extensive investigations were made to
verify the suitability of the VPMMD method for real-time forecasting applications.
Unlike, the simulation mode of routing, the routing is done by marching in time after
routing along the entire routing reach for the current inflow discharge. This way of
routing procedure is desirable especially for real-time flood operations in the river
IV
reaches. In order to verify this method, an application study was conducted for the
Pierantonio (upstream) and Ponte Felcino (downstream) reach of the Tiber River in
Central Italy by studying 10 recent flood events in forecasting mode. The forecasting
results were arrived at by considering the 15 km long Pierantonio and Ponte Felcino
reach, first as a single reach, and secondly considering as 2 sub-reaches (each of 7.5 km).
For all these forecasting experiments, the varied forecasting lead times such as 1.00 h,
1.50 h, 2.00 h, 2.50 h, and 3.00 h were used. The performance evaluation of the proposed
model is carried out in conjunction with an error forecasting model developed based on a
simple Autoregressive (AR) model. From all the investigation results obtained from this
forecasting study, it is found that the model produces accurate forecasting results along
with the corresponding stage estimates for a lead time up to 3.00 h, with the warm up
period considered for developing the error forecast AR model being 5.00 h. Therefore,
this newly proposed VPMMDRF model can be conveniently used for discharge
forecasting up to 3.00 h lead time in the considered Pierantonio-Ponte Felcino reach.