Abstract:
The discourse on management has increasingly focused on the performance of the
organizations to meet the challenges of global competition. Organizations have
initiated intervening strategies for providing primed quality of work life to sustain
potential employees for heightened • productivity and performance, which,
consequently, leads to well-being of employees at workplace. But currently, in
organizational behavior, very few researches have been initiated to delineate the
psychological well-being of employees, from the perspective of life satisfaction. For
this, it has been proposed that the relationship between the employee and the employer
must be collegial and this is feasible if there is perception of justice (Distributive
Justice, Procedural Justice, and Interactional Justice) within organization and the
employees exhibit citizenship behaviors (Altruism, Courtesy, Civic Virtue
Conscientiousness, Sportsmanship), which lubricate the social and psychological
fabric ofthe organization along with cumulated efficiency and productivity. Although,
there are myriad of researches which have suggested ways through which employees
can perceive justice within organizations and exhibit citizenship behaviors at
workplace, but the question that spurts is to what extent these positive attitudinal
behaviors (justice and citizenship behaviors) have spillover effect on the psychological
well-being (Environmental Mastery, Personal Growth, Positive Relations with Others,
Purpose in Life, Self-Acceptance) (Ryff, 1989) of employees, in terms of life
satisfaction. This moulds an individual competent enough to face the existential
challenges of life and represents the best of human condition. Thus, an initiative has
been taken to propel this quest and void that how positive attitudinal behaviors at
11
workplace have spillover effects on the psychological well-being of employees. The
purpose of this research is to study the relationship of organizational justice
(distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice) and organizational
citizenship behaviors (altruism, courtesy, civic virtue conscientiousness,
sportsmanship) with the psychological well-being (environmental mastery, personal
growth, positive relations with others, purpose in life, self-acceptance) of employees,
from the perspective of life satisfaction. And to what extent these positive attitudinal
behaviors at workplace influence well-being of employees.
The study was conducted on a sample of 200 managers working in different
organizations and convenient purposive sampling was used to conduct the study. The
study has been conducted on the basis of two proposed models which state that
antecedents of fairness perceptions and citizenship behaviors at workplace have
correlational or spillover effect on the psychological well-being of employees and
would also predict psychological well-being of employees, from the perspective of life
satisfaction. The model has been tested on the basis of Principal Component Analysis,
Pearson correlation and Stepwise Regression Analysis
The results suggested that the relationship of justice perceptions with
psychological well-being of employees is sparse and showed less variance in
influencing well-being, from the perspective of life satisfaction. Some dimensions of
justice correlated significantly with the dimensions of psychological well-being and
lowcorrelations have beensubjected to methodological reasons. Similarly, relationship
ofcitizenship behaviors with psychological well-being ofemployees has been found to
be significant and has also significantly influenced the well-being of employees and
in
supports the viewpoint that positive attitude behaviors at workplace have definitely
spillover effects on the psychological well-being of employees.
This study provides guidelines to help managers understand better the
psychological needs of the employees that lead to eudaimonistic well-being and
enhance human functioning and develop them as global citizens. Limitations and
future research are also forwarded with the viewpoint that organizations must move
beyond the formal business outcomes and find how work organizations can contribute
to an individual's well-being. In other words, we can say that individual's life outside
work must be an important concern for the organization.