Abstract:
The Indian economy is predominantly an agricultural
economy. Despite the decline in the relative share of
agriculture in GDP (32.%, in 1987-88 as compared to 56.5% in
1950-51), due to undergoing structural transformation as a
result of economic development programmes, it still provides
livelihood to an overwhelming majority of the Indian
population. As a matter of fact, while approximately 70
percent of the population is still engaged in agriculture,
more than 80 percent of the people in rural India, are
directly dependent upon this sector. Agriculture also
contributes a sizable part of exports and constitutes a
considerable proportion of imports too. Thus, India's
development in general and rural development in particular,
is by and large determined by the pace and direction of
agricultural development.
This phenomena had been realised by the policy
makers long back which resulted in teh commencement of green
revolution programmes in 1966. Since then the country
started moving closer to accomplishing the goal of complete
self sufficiency in the food production. The implementation
of green revolution programmes in the initial stage,
however, was not simple one. Its success could only be
ensured by the well coordinated combined efforts of the
agricultural scientists community workers and above all the
central and state governments. It was really very difficult
(viii)
to persuade the illierated farmers to switch over to
altogether unconventional methods of cultivation etc. in the
initial stage. Nevertheless, the states (especially Punjab,
Haryana and Western part Of U.P.J, where the programmes were
executed with missionary zeals and which also had access to
the more or less assured means of irrigation moved ahead of
others, leading to the percolation of comparatively larger
benefits to them. Farmer's response had also made a great
deal of difference in this connection.
In the initial stage, great thrust was laid, as has
already been pointed out, on attaining self-reliance in the
production of food grains. It was, in fact, a logical
consequence of the frequent droughts and discontinance of
food aid in the event of Indo-Pak war in 1965, acute shortage
of foreign exchange to import the required quantum of food
grains etc. Little planned and serious efforts have,
however, been made to cover non-cereal items namely
oilseeds, pulses etc., under the green revolution curriculum
even till the decade of 1980. This has led to the uneven
growth of production in agricultural sector. Inspite of
these pitfalls, it has, undoubtedly, revolutionalised the
production and productivity which was made possible through
radical, transformation in the farmer's attitude, capital
structure and through the application of better techniques
and improved inputs.
The present attempt is an endeavour. towards
evaluation of the rationality of farmers' behaviour in the
. (ix)
use of capital and other inputs in the production process.
The work has been done on the case study basis encompassing
Saharanpur district of the state of Uttar Pradesh. This
district is regarded as one of the principal beneficiaries
of the green revolution.
With the given objectives of the study, Cobb-Douglas
production function has been used. The main focus of the
study begins with the analysis of capital structure and
resource use efficiency in the agricultural sector proceeded
by marginal productivity and output-input analysis. The
study includes three main crops- sugarcane, wheat and paddy.
It has revealed that the behaviour of all categories of
farmers have not been rational in the matter of use of
inputs leading to less than the optimum level of production.
It also highlights the fact that the highest net returns
have been generatd by the sugarcane. The popular view that
the resource use efficiency has inverse relationship with
the size of holdings has not been corroborated by the
findings.
It is expected that this study, in its final
analysis, will turn out to be helpful to the planners and
policy makers.