DSpace Repository

FEASIBILITY OF LMR TEC

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jayesh, Bhayani Rutuj
dc.date.accessioned 2024-09-19T11:05:14Z
dc.date.available 2024-09-19T11:05:14Z
dc.date.issued 2019-05
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8081/xmlui/handle/123456789/15766
dc.description.abstract In order to map the subsurface to understand the potential of the hydrocarbons present, an understanding of the lithology and its uids is of the utmost importance. Geoscientists spend a lot of time identifying the lithologies using well logs, but there are instances when using the conventional methods gives us ambiguous results. Presence of uids or their withdrawal can change the signatures that we observe and leads to the ambiguity. In this study, we use crossplots of di erent petrophysical parameters like Lambda - Mu - Rho, P impedance and S impedance, Vp, Vs to classify and discriminate among the lithology and the uid. This study shows a comparative study of lithology and uid identi cation between sandstones and carbonates. Lambda Mu Rho technique, i.e. crossplots of Lambda Rho and Mu Rho is able to discriminate between gas sand, brine sand, carbonate and shale in a much better way. It also increases the detectability and sensitivity of uids and carbonates over other fundamental methods. In this study we see how the gas sands and non reservoir sands are separated from the background shales. We also see the behaviour of carbonates on the crossplots and understand their importance of the mineral constituting the carbonate formations. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher I I T ROORKEE en_US
dc.subject Characterization en_US
dc.subject Lithology en_US
dc.subject Lambda en_US
dc.subject Geoscientists en_US
dc.title FEASIBILITY OF LMR TEC en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record