Abstract:
Chirality has emerged as a key issue in drug design, discovery and development
as stereoisomer discrimination plays a significant role in many pharmacological
events. It is an important factor in drug efficacy. Dosage concentration ofa racemic drug
is an illusion to the patients as normally 50% drug is active while the other 50% is inactive
or may be toxic. About 56% of the drugs currently in use are chiral compounds, and
about 88% of these chiral synthetic drugs are administered as racemates. For
enantiomeric separation on analytical scale direct and indirect separations are achieved
using chromatographic methods. Indirect method is based on the use of chiral
derivatization reagents (CDRs) to form diastereomeric derivatives which can be
separated using an achiral stationary phase.
Majority of therapeutics such as anti-inflammatory/analgesic, adrenergic and
antihistamines drugs, agrochemicals and food additives are marketed as racemic
mixtures. Now a days, greater attention is focused on developing methods for
stereoselective and enantioselective synthesis. Hence chiral analytical methods remain
important in analysis of enantiomeric purity of drugs during their different steps of
synthesis, isolation from natural sources, and establishment of specifications for drug
marketing as well as monitoring stereospecific fate of drugs. The presence of suitable
functional groups in the molecule is a precondition of a successful derivatization. In
the direct approach, either a chiral mobile phase additive (CMPA) or a chiral stationary
phase (CSP) is used or the chiral selector is immobilized/ impregnated with the
stationary phase.
In view of the importance of enantiomeric analysis and application of
chromatographic technique, studies have been carried out on enantiomeric resolution
of certain compounds belonging to important pharmaceutical categories such as
anesthetic, /2-blockers, /32-agonist, penicillamine, angiotensin enzyme inhibitor, and
serotonin reuptake inhibitor. The enantiomeric separation has been achieved using
different chiral selectors and CDRs.
The first chapter is an introduction to chirality of pharmaceuticals, chiral
chromatographic approaches, selection criteria of CDRs and their applications. The
CDRs have been classified in different categories depending upon the nature of
functional group present in analytes. The literature related to the class of compounds
chosen has been cited in subsequent chapters.
Second chapter deals with the description of the common experimental methods
used for present studies particularly pertaining to synthesis and chromatographic (both
TLC and HPLC) conditions. It includes materials, instrumentation including HPLC. The
characterization data for the new CDRs is described, along with general protocols adopted
for the synthesis of MR, its structural variants and the diastereomers of different
compounds. CDRs synthesized are as follows: Marfey's reagent and its six structural
variants, namely, FDNP-L-Phe-NH2, FDNP-L-Val-NH2, FDNP-L-Leu-NH2, FDNP-LPro-
NH2, FDNP-L-Met-NH2 and FDNP-D-Phg-NH2 (CDRs-1 to 7) were synthesized
using six chiral auxiliaries L-Phe-NH2, L-Val-NH2, L-Leu-NH2, L-Pro-NH2, L-Met-NH2
and D-Phg-NH2 and characterized.
Chiral monochloro-s-triazines (MCTs) were synthesized by the nucleophilic
displacement of chlorine atoms. One of the CI atoms was replaced by piperidine and the
second CI atom in the 6-piperidinyl derivative was replaced with different amino acid
amides (namely, L-Leu-NH2, L-Phe-NH2, and D-Phg-NH2) and amino acids (L-Leu and
L-Ala). The present study involving the attachment of piperidine in cyanuric chloride (CC)
to prepare a new CDR has been the first report in literature. Five chiral monochloro-striazines
(MCTs) (CDR-8 to 12) were synthesized (namely, JV-(4-Chloro-6-piperidinyl-
[l,3,5]-triazine-2-yl)-L-leucinamide, JV-(4-Chloro-6-piperidinyl-[l,3,5]-triazine-2-yl)-Lphenylalaninamide,
iV-(4-Chloro-6-piperidinyl-[l,3,5]-triazine-2-yl)-D-phenylglycinamide,
A^-(4-Chloro-6-piperidinyl-[l,3,5]-triazine-2-yl)-L-leucine, and N-(4-Chloro-6-
piperidinyl-[l,3,5]-triazine-2-yl)-L-alanine).
Third chapter presents the literature survey for the selected CDRs and
analytes.
Fourth chapter presents direct enantioresolution of /^-blockers and one fcantagonist.
It has been divided into two sections.
Section A: Direct enantioresolution by normal phase TLC using ion exchange,
inclusion complexation, and ligandexchange approaches.
(i) L-aspartic acid and L-glutamic acid as chiral selectors: Direct resolution of six
racemic /^-blockers into their enantiomers wasachieved by normal phase TLC on silica
gel plates impregnated with optically pure L-aspartic acid and L-glutamic acid as
chiral selectors.
(ii) Vancomycin as chiral selector: Direct resolution of four racemic beta blockers
into their enantiomers was achieved by normal phase TLC on silica gel plates using
pure vancomycin as a chiral impregnating agent as well as CMPA.
(iii) Cu(II) complexes of L-tartaric acid, L-threonine, L-serine, D-penicillamine as
chiral impregnating agents: Silica plates were impregnated with Cu(II) complexes of
L-tartaric acid, L-threonine, L-serine, and D-penicillamine, for resolving four /?-
blockers and one /22-agonist into their enantiomers. The Cu (II)-L-chiral selector
complex was used to prepare impregnated silica gel plates.
In all the cases, the influence of pH, temperature and concentration of chiral selector
was studied. Detection of spots was done using iodine vapors. The TLC method was
validated for linearity, and limit of detection (LOD). Different solvent systems were
worked out to resolve the enantiomers.
Section B: Indirect enantioresolution of /^-blockers (metoprolol, carvedilol,
atenolol, propranolol) and /22-agonists (salbutamol and terbutaline) by preparing
diastereomers with Marfey's reagent, its variants, (S)-N-(4-
Nitrophenoxycarbonyl)phenylalaninemethoxyethyl ester {(5)-NIFE} reagent, and
monochloro-.s-triazine reagent was achieved. Methods were validated for limit of
detection, limit of quantification, linearity, accuracy, precision, and recovery. Both
TLC and HPLC methodologies were used.
in
(i) Chiral separation of diastereomers prepared with MR and its variants: These
were used for derivatization of metoprolol, carvedilol and terbutaline to form diastereomers. The diastereomers of metoprolol and carvedilol were separated most
effectively by use of mobile phases containing acetonitrile and triethylammonium
phosphate buffer by RP-TLC. The separation efficiency of the structural variants was
compared with that of MR. Diastereomers of (i?,5)-terbutaline were resolved by RPHPLC
using acetonitrile and 1%aq. TFA solution with gradient mobile phase.
(ii) HPLC separation of diastereomers prepared with (5)-NIFE: Reversed-phase
high-performance liquid chromatographic resolution of three racemic /^-blockers
(metoprolol, atenolol, propranolol) and one /E-agonist (salbutamol) has been achieved
using (5)-Ar-(4-nitrophenoxycarbonyl)phenylalaninemethoxyethyl ester [(5)-NIFE] as
the CDR. A linear gradient of mixtures of 0.1% aq. TFA and 0.1% TFA (in MeOH)
was found successful. The detection was made at 205 nm. Microwave irradiation was
made to synthesize the diastereomers and reaction conditions were optimized and
comparedwith the method of using conventional heating.
(iii) HPLC separation of diastereomers prepared with cyanuric chloride based
reagent: The diastereomers of /^-blockers (atenolol, propranolol and metoprolol) and (Jlagonist
(salbutamol) were prepared with CDR-8 and separated on a reversed-phase Ci8
column using mixtures of acetonitrile and aqueous-trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). Conditions
for derivatization kinetics were optimized with MCT reagent with respect to the effects of
pH, reagent excess, temperature and reaction time on derivatization yield. Mechanism of
separation of diastereomers has also been proposed.
Fifth chapter deals with direct and indirect enantioresolution of penicillamine.
Direct resolution of racemic PenA into its enantiomers was achieved by normal phase
TLC on silica gel plates using optically pure L-tartaric acid as CSP as well as CMPA
and also by (i?)-mandelic acid as CSP. Different solvent systems were worked out to
resolve the enantiomers. Spots were detected using iodine vapors. The TLC method
was validated for linearity, and limit of detection (LOD). The influence of pH,
temperature and concentration of chiral selector was studied. An HPLC method was
iv
established for enantioseparation of DL-PenA using (5>NIFE reagent as the CDR. The
method was validated for linearity, repeatability, and LOD.
Sixth chapter deals with enantioresolution of fluoxetine in pharmaceutical
formulations by both direct and indirect methods using HPLC and TLC. L-tartaric acid
has been used as a mobile phase additive in TLC and the enantiomers were separated
and isolated and were used to determine the elution order in HPLC. (^?,5)-flouxetine
was derivatized with (5)-NIFE, Marfey's reagent and l-fluoro-2,4-dinitrophenyl-Lmethionine
amide (FDNP-L-Met-NH2). The diastereomers were separated using RPHPLC.
The effect of flow rate, and TFA concentration on resolution was studied. The
diastereomers obtained by derivatization with FDNP-L-Met-NH2 were also separated
by RP-TLC.
Seventh chapter deals with enantioresolution of DL-amino acids, amino
alcohols, /2-blockers and a /2-agonist via synthesis of diastereomers prepared with (S)-
NIFE as the CDR using reversed-phase high-performance liquid-chromatographic
method. It is divided in two sections:
Section A: Indirect enantioresolution of 15 primary and secondary amino group
containing compounds (amino alcohols, non-protein amino acids, and PenA) was done
using the reagent (5)-NIFE by RP-HPLC. The diastereomeric derivatives were
analyzed under reversed phase conditions using linear gradient of mixtures of 0.1% aq.
TFA and 0.1% TFA in MeOH. Sharp peaks were obtained under these
chromatographic conditions. The detection was at 205 nm. Method validation was also
done.
Section B: CDRs 8 to 12 were used for the synthesis of distereomers of /^-blockers
(metoprolol, atenolol, and propranolol), /2-agonist (salbutamol), penicillamine, 18
protein and 08 non-protein amino acids. The resultant diastereomers were separated on
a reversed-phase C18 column using mixtures of acetonitrile and aqueous-trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA). The reaction conditions were optimized for derivatization kinetics with
CDR-1 with respect to the effects of pH, reagent excess, temperature and reaction time
on derivatization yield. HPLC method was also validated for limit of detection, limit of
quantification, linearity, and recovery. Effects of structural modifications in reagents
on chromatographic properties were investigated. Separation mechanism of
diastereomers has been proposed.
Eighth chapter presents direct TLC enantioresolution of ketamine and
Hsinopril belonging to the class of anesthetic and angiotensin enzyme inhibitor,
respectively. Direct resolution of racemic ketamine and Hsinopril into their
enantiomers was achieved by normal phase TLC on silica gel plates impregnated with
optically pure L-tartaric acid and (i?)-mandelic acid as chiral impregnating agent
and/or as CMPA. Different solvent systems were worked out to resolve the
enantiomers. Spots were detected using iodine vapor. The TLC method was validated
for linearity, and limit of detection (LOD). The influence of pH, temperature and
concentration of chiral selectors was studied.