Abstract:
Some natural seeds contain valuable chemical components, which are used for medicinal
purposes to cure various chronic diseases. However, extracting these chemicals in pure natural form
is a challenge. This problem can be somewhat resolved by supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)
technique. In the present work, two seeds, namely Argemone mexicana (L.) (AM) and Pongamia
pinnata (L.) (PP) are selected for extraction. This selection is purely based on the properties and
applications of these two seed oils found in literature. A thorough literature review indicates that
AM and PP seeds contains good percentage of oil, which contain some valuable chemical
components such as fatty acids and alkaloids that can be used as medicine to cure various chronic
deceases. Besides, the medicinal requirements, these oils also have a potential to produce biofuel.
For commercial purposes, oils from these two seeds, are generally extracted by means of
conventional extraction techniques such as soxhlet extraction, mechanical pressing, percolation
methods, etc. However, due to the lower yield, loss of valuable components, refining hurdles and
safety aspects make these conventional methods cost intensive and environmentally incompatible.
Furthermore, the oil obtained through these methods, needs to be processed for cleaning and removal
of organic solvents (e.g. n-hexane, methanol, isopropanol etc.) which are used during conventional
extraction techniques (e.g. soxhlet extraction, percolation method). Even the added processing of the
oils, do not remove organic solvents completely from the final product (oil). Therefore, the use of
supercritical fluids (SFs), as an alternative solvent, during the extraction of seed oils has been
attracting widespread attention due to their advantageous properties such as liquid-like density, gaslike
viscosity and negligible surface tension.
This new method (e.g. SFE) also meets environmental regulations and promotes its
utilization as green method. The SFE, using supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) has also been
recognized as the latest emerging eco-friendly and clean separation technology for various valuable
food ingredients from natural products, pharmaceutical products, etc., with high yield and better
quality products under a wide range of operating conditions. Among various SFs, SC-CO2 has
achieved the unique popularity due to its non-flammability, -non-toxicity, -non-explosive behavior,
-low cost, -availability in plenty amount and -easy to separate out from the extracted product.
In the present experimental investigation, oils are extracted from AM and PP seeds by means
of SC-CO2. The SFE experiments have been performed using SFE 1000F apparatus, supplied by
ii
Thar Technologies Inc., Pittsburgh. The software, ‘Design Expert 10.0’ has been used to design the
number of experiments in a methodological way that actually help to develop a statistical analysis
based correlation between input and output variables. The ANOVA (analysis of variance) has been
performed to establish the relative significance of the individual input parameters (e.g. temperature,
pressure, particle size, flow rate-CO2 and the % of co-solvent) and their interaction effects.
For the present SFE process, the above five input parameters of significance have been
screened out from thirteen influencing input parameters from the available published literature (as
listed in section 2.3), and finally the effect of these input parameters on the cumulative extraction
yield (CEY) of oil have been identified. Final five selected SFE operating parameters were optimized
for maximum yield via response surface methodology (RSM) with a ‘five-factors-three-levels’ Box-
Behnken design (BBD).
The regression analysis of the experimental data of SFE process for AM and PP seed oils,
has confirmed that the quadratic model (second-order polynomial equation) is the best for the
prediction of CEY. This quadratic model offers the R2 values as 0.9737 and 0.9944 respectively for
AM and PP seeds. Further, the statistical analysis has also shown that the interactions amongst all
the five input parameters exist. Further, for both seeds, % of co-solvent and pressure have been
observed to be the most influencing parameters followed by each one. The prediction of CEY values,
through quadratic model, have been found within error range of ‘+14.4 to -11.28 %’, and ‘+18.39 to
-16.32 %’ of experimental values for AM and PP seed oils respectively.
Furthermore, an artificial neural network (ANN) model has been developed, using
experimental data and for this, a trainable, feed-forward-back-propagation (FFBP) network has been
used to predict the CEY of both seed oils with an acceptable level of accuracy. From a number of
performing ANN models, an optimized model ‘FFBPN [5-6-1]’ has been selected for prediction of
the CEY. The ‘FFBPN [5-6-1]’ shows average absolute relative deviation percentage (AARD %),
mean square error (MSE)) and best regression coefficient (R2) for the SFE of AM and PP seed oils
as ‘3.33 %, 0.0038, 0.9835’ and ‘4.39 %, 0.00051, 0.9874’ respectively.
The present SFE process has been modeled by applying two mass transfer phenomenon based
models (MTPBMs) (e.g. Sovova, 1994 and Reverchon, 1996). The fitting parameters (e.g. Z, W and
xk) of the Sovova model (Sovova, 1994) have been optimized using the global optimization technique
(genetic algorithm (GA) approach) by running a written program in MATLAB to minimize the
iii
AARD % between the CEY’s, obtained from the Sovova model and from the experiments during
the SFE of AM and PP seed oils. On the other hand, the Reverchon model (Reverchon, 1996) is also
solved and fitted with the present SFE experimental data using the COMSOL Multiphysics 5.3a.
It is found that the Sovova model (SM) has produced excellent fitting with the experimental
CEY data within an error band of ‘1.436 to 14.198 %’ and ‘0.7706 to 14.17 %’ for AM and PP seed
oils respectively. From the results of SM, it has also been observed that the mass transfer coefficients
in solvent phase () are larger than the mass transfer coefficients in the solid phase () for all
parametric conditions. In comparison to SM, Reverchon model (RM) has produced partially good
fittings with experimental data within an error band of ‘5.52 to 96.3 %’ and ‘2.64 to 19.74 %’ for
AM and PP seed oils respectively. It is noted that RM is good for predicting the final value of CEY
and not the intermediate CEY value with time.
After the extraction of oils from AM and PP seeds, the physico-chemical properties (e.g.
calorific value (MJ/kg), flash point (ºC), fire point (ºC), cloud point (ºC), pour point (ºC), acid value
(mg KOH/g), peroxide value (meq/kg sample), and saponification value (mg KOH/g)) of oil samples
have been determined. The chemical compositions of seed oils, obtained through both extraction
methods (soxhlet and SFE methods), were analyzed and quantified using gas chromatography (GC).
In addition to these, the characterization of feed (seeds) are also performed by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM), Thermo-gravimetric (TG) analysis and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
spectroscopy.
The characterizations (e.g. total oil content (%), moisture (%), ash (%), SEM, TG analysis
and FTIR analyses) were also performed on the seed particles of AM and PP seeds. The total oil
content, moisture content and ash content are found as ‘42%, 9.6% & 3.5%’ and ‘36%, 5.4% &
1.8%’ for AM and PP seed particles respectively. The FTIR analyses of both seed particles have
confirmed the presence of fatty acids, alkaloids, and protein. TG analyses has also confirmed the
moisture and ash content. The morphological changes at the surfaces of AM and PP seeds have also
been studied during the SFE process through SEM analysis. On the other hand, GC analysis of the
product (oil) shows that AM seed oil is rich in linoleic acid (C18:2n6c), oleic acid (C18:1n9c),
palmitic acid (C16:0), and stearic acid (C18:0), with the range of concentrations (weight %) as ‘22.54
- 59.07 %’, ‘25.01 - 41.46%’, ‘11.40 - 23.58 %’, and ‘2.98 – 5.97 %’ respectively. Whereas, the PP
seed oil is found rich in oleic acid (C18:1n9c), arachidic acid (C20:0), cis-10-pentadecanoic acid
iv
(C15:1), stearic acid (C18:0), cis-8,11,14-Eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n6), linolenic acid (C18:3n3),
gamma(ϒ)-linolenic acid (C18:3n6) and cis-11-Eicosenoic acid (C20:1) and are found in the range
of concentrations (weight %) as ‘45.42 - 58.62%’, ‘15.34 - 18.02%’, ‘8.64 - 11.95%’, ‘5.74 - 7.04%’,
‘2.62 - 4.45%’, ‘1.24 - 4.01%’, ‘0.34 - 1.53%’, and ‘0.0 - 3.93%’ respectively.
Further, the physicochemical properties (e.g. heating value (MJ/kg), flash point, (°C), fire
point (°C), cloud point (°C), pour point (°C), saponification value (mg KOH/g), peroxide value
(meq/kg sample) and acid value (mg KOH/g)) of the extracted AM and PP seed oils during SFE,
suggest that the oils could also be used for bio-fuel.
Finally, the economic analysis of the SFE process at industrial scale (for 1000 liters capacity
of extraction vessel) has confirmed the economic feasibility, based on the obtained payback periods
as ‘1.63’ and ‘1.84’ years for the envisaged plant of SFE process of AM and PP seed oils
respectively.