Abstract:
Campus Sustainability is a unique opportunity of transforming educational campuses of higher
learning, particularly the residential ones, into living laboratories for the demonstration of
Environmental Sustainability. Higher Educational institutions play a vital role at the Regional,
National and International level concerning their responsibility to society and can act as a
catalyst to foster Sustainable Development. In early 1990s, campuses around the world adopted
various Green Campus projects and Sustainability practices to showcase their participation in
the worldwide movement of Sustainable Development. Efforts, then, were made to implement
various policies for Sustainable Development of the nation through launching various
Declarations at National and International levels. These Declarations focus on components e.g.
- Curricula, Research, Operations, Outreach, Assessment and Reporting. Operational Campus
Sustainability further addresses parameters such as Buildings, Climate, Air Quality, Dining
Services, Energy, Ground, Recycling, Food, Transportation, Water and Waste. Various
Campus Sustainability Association /Organizations were also formed and formulated with an
objective to integrate Sustainability into Education, Research and Campus Operations. The
commitment to Sustainability was also so varied in content and context with introduction of
Master plans, Environmental plans, Environmental guidelines etc. (Velazquez L, et al., 2006)by
some of the institutions whereas for others it was achieved through being active signatories to
National and International Declarations (Wright TSA.2002). Campus Sustainability practices
differed from campus to campus on the basis of the geographical location, existing cultural
norms, perceptions and attitudes and finally financial resources available. In order to quantify
the extent and degree of acceptable practices and alternatives of Sustainable growth adopted
and their relative merits and efficiency a number of Assessment Tools have been developed in
the latter part of the 1990’s and refinements and alternatives to these are continuing.
As per the UGC report of 2012, the student population on India is more than 100 million in
Institutions of higher learning which number more than 2000 Universities (UGC report, 2012).
However, in India, Campus Sustainability is in its very nascent stage, with little or no
coordinated effort being made even by many of the leading National institutions. Recent studies
conducted in India highlighting various aspects of sustainability (A.Mishra.at.el.2008,
Gobinath.R.2010. Alexandar, R., & G Poyyamoli.2011, Ramchandra .T.V. 2012, Beena P. &
Pankaj.P., 2012, Patil.T.S. et. al.2012) are a testimony to the foregoing.
P a g e | ii
The present study is focused on the development of an Operational Campus Sustainability
Assessment Tool for Higher Educational Residential Campuses in India. The Objective of the
research is
i) To establish the concept of Operational Sustainability of Campuses in terms of its
components, principles, parameters and objectives.
ii) To develop an approach for analysis of Operational Campus Sustainability
iii) To analyze the current Campus Sustainability Practices in selected Indian residential
campuses on a comparative basis,
iv) To analyse stakeholders’ perception on Campus Sustainability parameters, practices,
and strategies,
v) To propose a Campus Sustainability Model suitable for Indian Residential
Campuses, and
vi) To evolve a set of suitable sustainability indicators, assessment tool and benchmarks
for Indian Residential Campuses.
Six residential Institutions were selected for the study namely; Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore (IISc), Indian Institute of Madras (IIT M), Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi
(BHU), Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IIT K), Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
(IIT B) and Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IIT R). Based on the availability of data
and current sustainability practices observed through primary and secondary surveys, a unique
approach of analysis has been developed consisting of four steps namely; Resource
Consumption Analysis (RCA), Critical Area Analysis (CAA), Perception Analysis (PA) and
Tool based Analysis (TBA). Based on the analysis, suitable Sustainable Indicators for Indian
Residential Campuses are listed and developed an Appropriate Assessment methodology that is
further integrated with proposed Campus Sustainability Model.
Study on Student, Faculty and Staff population over the year’s highlight that, institutions are
trying to increase Student population and decrease Faculty and Staff. This is one of the major
steps taken towards Economic Sustainability. Land plays an important role in Campus
Sustainability, detailed understanding and study of various land uses will help to understand
productivity and consumption of various resources. Campus planning and designing of all
campuses are different varying from compact planning to scattered type. Footprint areas of all
campuses show that most are having nearly one-third area as built up space and remaining
unbuilt space. This indicates an immense potential to balance the Supply and Demand ratio.
P a g e | iii
There is no similarity in per capita areas provided under various land uses, which indicates a
lack of guidelines. There are Constant land use demands (f(C)) which do not change with
increase in student population, and Fluctuating land use demand (f(t)) which changes with
increase in Student and Faculty intake. It is important to study power demand patterns to
understand power usage of an institution. Constant power demands(C) and Fluctuating power
demands (F (t)) help to understand the critical areas in an institution. Constant power demands
can further be divided into two types namely; revenue generation and essential utilities. Water
consumption mainly depends upon the local climatic factors i.e. Hot summers require more
water than the cold winters. Waste produced throughout the year, however, is almost similar
irrespective of the time of the year. Quantification of waste at each location helps to identify
the critical areas within the campus. A Comprehensive Survey with regard the stakeholders
perceptions to the foregoing was conducted in thirteen institutes, spread geographically in
various parts of India. Student, Faculty and Staff in all the institutes think alike and expressed
their major concern for management of potable water, wastewater and storm water. Similar
concerns were observed for energy related issues. As per the responses, activities related to
energy, water and waste management were inadequate in their campuses. Respondents of the
surveys were of the opinion that promoting efficient land use, use of bicycles, improving
pedestrian paths, implementing various transportation policies and maintaining flora of the
campus were among the few meriting greater priority.
Sustainability Assessment of an institution is a complex task by itself and when many
institutions need to be compared the complexity increases many fold. A number of
Sustainability Assessment Tools have evolved to address the foregoing issues. However,
technological evolution and metamorphosis of the socioeconomic environ has rendered the
assessment tools inadequate to address contemporary assessment of sustainability as presently
pursued. Diversity in their approach to a common goal of sustainability assessment provides a
relative comparison of institution by each assessment tool. Reduction of the
rating/grading/ranking of each of the sustainability assessment tools to a common datum
indicated clearly that, there is poor correlation between them. Data handling and maintenance is
a major issue in many of the institutions with data related to Education and Research being
readily available but data related to other sustainability parameters being poorly documented if
at all. In older institutes centralized data is available on campus infrastructure but data on
energy consumption, water consumption and waste generation is not well documented. Thus, it
is important for an institute to document the details of consumption of various resources
through Data Processing Indicators so that they can be balanced by adopting various
P a g e | iv
sustainability measures through Strategy Indicators (SI). Periodical assessment of indicators
further assists an institute to gauge the efficacy of their sustainability efforts and adopt
appropriate measures accordingly.
The proposed model consists of a ACTION LEVELS –DATA AVAILABILITYINDICATORS
–ASSESSMENT. The Action Levels consists of four stages that include Base
Data processing, Planning, Execution, Monitoring & Measurement and Maintenance. Details of
Data processing are worked in detail. The data availability part focuses more on availability of
preliminary and detailed data. Indicator part consist of basket of data processing and strategy
Indicators that are derived from survey analysis. The Assessment -part focuses on assessment
of data with available Benchmarks (Qn-SAT) and Sustainability Strategies (Ql-SAT).
Uniqueness of the proposed model is that it focuses operational indicators that include the
entire spectrum from data processing to data monitoring.
The study on “sustainability assessment of higher educational residential campuses” focuses
on Operational Sustainability of higher educational campuses that can be extended to other
aspects of sustainability like Social, Economical and Educational Sustainability of Indian
higher educational campuses. Further Operational Sustainability is limited to only four
parameters like Land use, Energy, Water, and Waste that can be extended to Transportation,
Air quality, Food etc. Proposed Campus Sustainability Model adopt detailed methodology for
Data processing which can be extended to Planning, Execution, Monitoring, &
Measurement and Maintenance Benchmarks derived in the present research is based on only
technical campuses that can be extended to other campuses to get more updated values
annually. Similar research can be extended to any other residential campuses and related
benchmarks can be developed accordingly. Proposed Ql-SAT utilises strategy indicators that
are assessed qualitatively however, this model can help in appraising improvements
quantitatively in the future.