DSpace Repository

SELECTION OF COST EFFECTIVE WASTE WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kumar, Adesh
dc.date.accessioned 2017-10-30T05:23:30Z
dc.date.available 2017-10-30T05:23:30Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier M.Tech en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/13893
dc.description.abstract Various technological alternatives for waste water treatment are available ranging from conventional methods to advance treatment methods. Selection process often diddles decision makers specially when multiple factors in selection of appropriate technology need to be considered. In this study, a holistic decision making approach has been developed for sustainable development considering multiple factors ranging from economic parameters to social and environmental parameters. In this study, Capital cost, operation and maintenance cost, land requirement depicts the economic concern of selection procedure and Global warming potential, Eutrophication potential depicts environmental concern and to take into account social concern robustness of system and sustainability criteria have been incorporated. Suitability of any technology largely depends upon the location of the plant, land availability and objectives of the treatment etc. or in other words it depends on the scenario for which plant need to be constructed. So for this aspect to take into account four scenario have been formulated to capture regional and local societal priorities of suburban and urban areas. Three most commonly used waste water treatment technologies viz. Sequential batch reactor (SBR), Activated sludge process (ASP) and Up flow sludge blanket- Final polishing pond (UASB-FPP) have been evaluated in this study. Commonly used multiple attribute decision making approach TOPSIS has been selected for ranking the alternatives. Among the three technologies considered for the assessment, SBR was identified as the most suitable alternative for all four scenarios not only because SBR has low land requirements and having less life cycle cost per MLD compared to other two technologies but SBR produces considerably good effluent quality also. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship AHEC, IIT ROORKEE en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher AHEC, IIT ROORKEE en_US
dc.subject Waste water en_US
dc.subject Treatment technologies en_US
dc.subject Alternate Hydro Energy Centre en_US
dc.title SELECTION OF COST EFFECTIVE WASTE WATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY en_US
dc.type M.Tech Dissertation en_US
dc.accession.number G26425 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record