dc.description.abstract |
The most fundamental problem in carrying out Performance Based Seismic Design (PBSD)
is to grasp the nature of seismic loading on building structures. In this context, energy
concept has been considered as the principal loading for seismic input and evaluation of
capacity. For the present study, energy balance criterion for performance based seismic
design is presented. Such criterion is promising for development of cumulative damage
indices under seismic loading.
The study presented herein, aims at investigation of performance based seismic
design of steel building frameworks using energy based evaluation. Energy based seismic
design is based on the principle of balancing the input seismic energy through the energy
absorbing/dissipating capacity of the structure. Using the energy balance equation, the
amount of various energy capacities is quantified. Initial input seismic energy is consumed
by the structure as elastic strain energy; a part of input seismic energy is dissipated as
viscous damping energy, while the structure is elastic. Kinetic energy of the mass, along
with elastic strain energy constitutes vibration energy. At the end of earthquake ground
motion, this energy gets dissipated as viscous energy. Identification and quantification of
inelastic energy in severe earthquake ground motions has been subject of the recent state of
art, since earthquake resistant design allows damages for larger ground motions, because
meeting corresponding demand through strength is not economically viable as well as
higher strength does not warranty the better performance at the same time larger earthquake
is rare to occur during the design life of a structure. In the study, the issue of performance
based seismic design is reassessed for multi-performance objectives. The existing
performance objective formats are discretized events on the possible damage spectrum
under varying earthquake ground motions in space and time. Recent trend of research in this
regard accepts the potentiality of energy based design as a better approach for further
formulation and development of design aids, which are close to damages even better than
displacement approach. Thus, energy based seismic design is viewed as an effective design
approach for assessment of performance evaluation and further formulation of PBSD for
new design decisions. Nonlinear static pushover analyses are popular for performance
evaluation using force/displacement controlled/modal procedures. The aim of nonlinear
static pushover analysis is to estimate the displacement in spite of the earthquake load
imposes reversal of stresses due to its simplicity in comparison to the nonlinear dynamic
loading. Input seismic energy has been investigated using the present state of art. An
111
algorithm of energy based capacity curve has been developed using the conventional
pushover analysis procedures through some example building frames evaluated under
varying earthquake ground motions. Energy based capacity curve is the plot of energy along
ordinate and displacement along abscissa. Sequence of hinge formations are directly
recorded through the variation of energy slope of energy capacity curve. Simplification of
energy based capacity curve results into better damage assessment. Plotting conventional
base shear and the corresponding energy capacity curve on the same ordinate and
displacement on abscissa shows a clear relationship corresponding to various performance
levels. Such a capacity curve for a particular structure is an index for its use under varying
earthquake ground motions for evaluating capacity in terms of energy. Knowing the actual
displacement, energy capacity may be evaluated using the developed capacity curve. In
developing energy based design approach and assessing the damage potential of structures,
distribution of input seismic energy among its components: strain energy, kinetic energy,
damping energy and hysteretic energy, are required. This study is focused on the accuracy
for input seismic energy evaluation and further distribution of the energy among its
components in order to formulate some pattern of damage pattern as required for the
performance assessment, during performance based seismic design.
The present performance levels are disctretized and are used in such way that one
performance level has no relation with the other, however all performance levels are
inherently associated with the each other. During this study it has been demonstrated
through energy based relations under varying demands are related with each other in a
definite fashion, which provide the support that the damage spectrum are continuous, and
not discretized. In this regard a relation between elastic strain energy and inelastic energy
has been established using suitable assumptions.
Elastic strain energy and the inelastic strain energy (hysteretic energy) have close
relationship, since they represent the internal configuration of structure. A simple algorithm
in between these two energy parameters has been developed as the content of this research
program. Hysteretic energy, which is the outcome of the energy dissipated through yielding,
depends upon the size and number of loops. Cumulative hysteretic energy under reversal of
stresses due to varying earthquake ground motions, which is the major task of performance
based design evaluation that can be viewed through the elastic strain energy since hysteretic
energy is closely related.
Further, damage indices available in the literature are reassessed and extended using
the energy response parameters as obtained during this research program. Interpretation of |
en_US |