SIMULATION OF MEMBRANE REACTOR FOR STEAM REFORMING OF METHANE

Abstract

The present investigation pertains to a theoretical study of mathematical model 'of fluidized bed Membrane reactor, for methane steam reforming, by simulating the operating variables of the reactor for high methane gas conversion and yield of hydrogen. Basically, it deals with the development of the mathematical model of a batch reactor and fluidized bed membrane reactor under perfectly mixed (CSTR) and plug flow (PFR) conditions for methane steam reforming. Further, it compares both the models for fluidized bed membrane reactor i.e. CSTR and PFR • model and validates the fluidized bed membrane reactor under plug flow conditions with the available experimental data in the literature. Finally, it investigates the effect of operating variables of the batch reactor and fluidized bed membrane reactor under plug flow conditions on the Methane gas Conversion and yield of hydrogen. Using the equation of mass balance in a batch reactor and kinetics equations of methane steam reforming by the author Xu et. al. [34], a niathematical model has been developed. The resulting model has been solved on MATLAB for the 'methane gas conversion and yield of hydrogen. The effects of operating variables, viz; reactor pressure, temperature, steam to methane ratio (SMR) and oxygen to methane ratio (OMR) have been studied. Results reveal that Methane gas conversion and yield of hydrogen increases with increase in temperature and SMR whereas decreases with decrease in reactor pressure. The mathematical models of fluidized bed membrane reactor under CSTR and PFR conditions have been developed by using the mass balance, macroscopically for the same kinetics of methane steam reforming, given by Xu et. al. [34]. The models have been simulated by the MATLAB and the comparison was made, which showed that PFR model prOvides better yield of hydrogen and methane gas conversion. Further the PFR model has been validated with the experimental data of methane gas conversion and yield of hydrogen available in the literature and was found that the prediction from the models are in excellent agreement with the experimental values, with a maximum deviation of -12% to +13% and -12% to +1.8% for Methane gas conversion and yield of hydrogen, respectively.