Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8081/xmlui/handle/123456789/4355
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRochlani, P. G.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-06T08:24:26Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-06T08:24:26Z-
dc.date.issued1984-
dc.identifierM.Techen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4355-
dc.guideSaram, Nayan-
dc.guideJoshi, V. H.-
dc.description.abstractClassical earth pressure theories of Coulomb and Rankine for static case and of Mononobe •-Okabe for dynamic case consider force equilibrium conditions only and neglect moment equilibrium condition. Hence, they fail to predict pressure distribution. prakash and Ba savana proposed a method for obtaining static and dynamic earth- pressure distribution considering all the three conditions of equilibrium. However, some of their as sump tions do not appear to be reasonable. The numerical method proposed by Joshi and Prajapati overcomes this difficulty. However, the assumed pressure distribution, though in agreement with equilibrium conditions is not unique. Be-sides, none of the st methods detect and eliminate the computa-tion of dynamic earth pressures larger than the passive pressures that can be mobilized at a given depth below the fill level. As such, there is a need for a better method of analysis for obtaining earth pressure distribution.....en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectWATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENTen_US
dc.subjectBARRAGE ABUTMENTSen_US
dc.subjectEARTHen_US
dc.subjectCLASSICAL EARTH PRESSURE THEORIESen_US
dc.title:EARTH. :PRESSURE. DISTRIBUTION— ON BARRAGE ABUTMENTSen_US
dc.typeM.Tech Dessertationen_US
dc.accession.number178229en_US
Appears in Collections:MASTERS' THESES (WRDM)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WRDM178229.pdf4.95 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.