1. Shodhbhagirathi @ IITR
  2. MECHANICAL & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
  3. MASTERS' THESES (MIED)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8081/xmlui/handle/123456789/2511
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJain, Vijay Kumar-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-28T05:26:29Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-28T05:26:29Z-
dc.date.issued1973-
dc.identifierM.Techen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2511-
dc.guidePandey, P. C.-
dc.description.abstract"Facing Test For Machinability Testingb~, proposed by G. Lorenz, is an alternative method for the conventional turning test. But facing test for machir•ability testing had been a subject of discussion among the research workers. Heiitbotham and Pend ey have raised some doubts about the reliability of this method for machinability det exmination. They say that two method's, facing arrt conventional turning can be compared only when the r 'k of 'year instantenious values of .pressure, temperature and/ 9' p- fa 'na-J are the some in both cases. In this work experiments have been performed, mainly to test the validity of facing test for machinability testing from the point of view of instantenious values of pressure an# temperature in two types of tests. As a result of experimentation we have found that Facing Test is not a reliable method for machinability testing.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectMECHANICAL & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGen_US
dc.subjectFACING TESTen_US
dc.subjectMACHINABILITY TESTINGen_US
dc.subjectMACHINABILITYen_US
dc.titleFACING TEST FOR MACHINABILITY TESTINGen_US
dc.typeM.Tech Dessertationen_US
dc.accession.number107610en_US
Appears in Collections:MASTERS' THESES (MIED)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MIED107610.pdf3.57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.