<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Community:</title>
    <link>http://localhost:8081/jspui/handle/123456789/18</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 21:21:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-05-07T21:21:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ESTIMATION OF IRRIGATION WATER REQUIREMENT IN CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIO FOR BETWA BASIN</title>
      <link>http://localhost:8081/jspui/handle/123456789/20720</link>
      <description>Title: ESTIMATION OF IRRIGATION WATER REQUIREMENT IN CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIO FOR BETWA BASIN
Authors: Pyasi, Reetesh Kumar
Abstract: In this study, assessment of climate change and its impact on irrigation water requirement&#xD;
has been carried out for the Betwa river basin located in Central part of India partially in&#xD;
Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. This study has been planned with specific objectives of&#xD;
(1) Evaluation of ETo estimates of two temperature based equations Hargreaves and Blaney-&#xD;
Criddle with the estimates of Penman- Monteith Equation for the Betwa Basin. (2) Trend&#xD;
analysis of weather parameters (Minimum Temperature, Maximum Temperature and Relative&#xD;
Humidity), evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirement. (3) Spatial distribution of&#xD;
crop coefficient (Kc) value using vegetation indices map derived from satellite data. In this&#xD;
study various meteorological data (Temperature, Relative Humidity, Wind Speed, Sunshine&#xD;
Hour and Rainfall) and satellite data were used for the purpose. Field visit of the study area&#xD;
was conducted twice for the purpose of ground truth verification. CROPWAT 8.0 software&#xD;
was used for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration by Penman-Monteith method and&#xD;
effective rainfall. ERDAS Imagine V9.2 was used for the processing the satellite data and&#xD;
generating LULC map and mapping of monthly Kc map from NDVI/SAVI map was carried&#xD;
out in ArcGIS V9.3 software. Correlation analysis of various weather parameters (Minimum&#xD;
Temperature, Maximum Temperature, Mean Temperature and Relative Humidity) has been&#xD;
carried out. Irrigation water requirement of the study area has been estimated using 29 years&#xD;
weather parameter (Minimum Temperature, Maximum Temperature, Mean Temperature and&#xD;
Relative Humidity) and weighed crop coefficient approach. Trend analyses of all climatic&#xD;
variables along with Crop Water Requirement (CWR) and Irrigation Water Requirement&#xD;
(IWR) have been done using Mann-Kendall test and Theil-sen's slope estimator. Finally&#xD;
spatial crop water requirement of the study area was carried out using vegetation indices&#xD;
(SAVI and NDVI) derived from satellite data for Rabi season of the year 2010-I1. Blaney-&#xD;
Criddle equation shows better results than Hargreaves equation when their ETo estimates&#xD;
were compared with Penman-Monteith estimates. Trends of ETo and 1WR were found&#xD;
negative in the Betwa basin. Further GIS based approach revealed that irrigation water&#xD;
requirement in the months from November 2010 to April 2011 were 54.57, 85.74, 74.54,&#xD;
63.82, 71.62 and 23.14 Mm3 over whole Betwa basin</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8081/jspui/handle/123456789/20720</guid>
      <dc:date>2014-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EVALUATION OF EVAPOTRANSPIRATION MODELS IN HUMID REGION</title>
      <link>http://localhost:8081/jspui/handle/123456789/20709</link>
      <description>Title: EVALUATION OF EVAPOTRANSPIRATION MODELS IN HUMID REGION
Authors: Mohammad, Almutaz Abdelkarim Abdelfattah
Abstract: Forty fiit Evapotranspiration models have been evaluated and calibrated against&#xD;
FAO Penman-Monteith model, the models were grouped into: nine Temperature&#xD;
methods, twenty Radiation methods, nine Mass transfer methods and seven Pan&#xD;
Evaporation methods. It has been found that one version of Hargreaves Equation HAR&#xD;
was the best performing method among Temperature methods, FAO-MAK was the best&#xD;
among Radiation based methods, TRABERT and MAHRIN were the best models from&#xD;
mass transfer models. Pan methods were found to be with the lowest performance. Most&#xD;
of mass transfer has shown good performance.&#xD;
IV Seven ANN models with different inputs combination have been tested also and it has&#xD;
been found that ANN2 with temperature and wind speed as inputs is sufficient to estimate&#xD;
Evapotranspiration better than all conventional models.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8081/jspui/handle/123456789/20709</guid>
      <dc:date>2014-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>HYDROLOGICAL IMPACTS OF LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE IN THE  MAT RIVER BASIN, INDIA</title>
      <link>http://localhost:8081/jspui/handle/123456789/20590</link>
      <description>Title: HYDROLOGICAL IMPACTS OF LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE IN THE  MAT RIVER BASIN, INDIA
Authors: Hamlet, K
Abstract: Land use-land cover (LULC) changes have significantly affected the Mat River basin, &#xD;
India water cycle over the years. Population development evolving new demands as a &#xD;
result of global growth and varying consumption habits have contributed to a decrease in &#xD;
fresh water supply and distribution over time. In this study, hydrological modeling upper &#xD;
catchment area of Mat River was carried out for the assessment of water availability by &#xD;
using ‘Soil and Water Assessment Tool’ (SWAT) which is a physically based, spatially &#xD;
distributed, a continuous model. SWAT Model was run for a period of 34 years (1986 to &#xD;
2019 with 1986 &amp; 1987 as warm period). Calibration and validation was done by &#xD;
SWATCUP (SUFI2) using the monthly stream discharges from 1988 to 1996 and 2015 to &#xD;
2019 respectively. The model is evaluated for performance using Coefficient of &#xD;
Determination (R2), Nash Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Per Cent Bias (PBIAS) and RSR the &#xD;
values of which are 0.72, 0.71, 3.30 and 0.52 respectively during calibration respectively. &#xD;
The calibrated value is used for running SWAT model using LULC of different years &#xD;
(2005, 2010 and 2015). During the study year, the built up area, mixed forest area and &#xD;
orchard coverage increases by 0.428 km2 (17.95%), 13.347 km2 (42.86%) and 0.05 km2 &#xD;
(5.26%) respectively. In the meantime, evergreen forest and agriculture area decreases by &#xD;
6.57 km2 (6.72%) and 7.29 km2 (45%) respectively. The changes in LULC leads to an &#xD;
increase of average monthly flow during monsoon by 3.92 cumec (0.14%) but decreases &#xD;
during non-monsoon season by 1.20 cumec (0.16%). During this period, the total annual &#xD;
aquifer recharge decreases by 17.25mm while the total water yield increases by a small &#xD;
margin from 1997.96 mm to 1999.49 mm (1.53 mm). The model shows that the average &#xD;
annual rainfall during the study period is 2692.40 mm out of which 1959.57 mm (73%) &#xD;
contributes to stream flow, 515.43 mm goes as evapo-transpiration, 34.16 mm is used for &#xD;
groundwater recharge.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8081/jspui/handle/123456789/20590</guid>
      <dc:date>2021-06-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Land Use/ Cover Dynamics assessment in the Right Upper Kikuletwa Sub catchment Pangani River Basin, Tanzania</title>
      <link>http://localhost:8081/jspui/handle/123456789/20538</link>
      <description>Title: Land Use/ Cover Dynamics assessment in the Right Upper Kikuletwa Sub catchment Pangani River Basin, Tanzania
Authors: Malagila, Febian Famillar
Abstract: This study, compares two models (LCM and CA-Markov by MCPI) used for prediction of Land &#xD;
assesses the historical and future LULC Dynamics (LULCD) in the Right Upper Kikuletwa Sub catchment &#xD;
by utilizing Remote sensing and Geographical Information System (GIS) Techniques. This sub catchment &#xD;
with a total area of about 769.46Km2   is very potential for the water resources in Kikuletwa catchment &#xD;
and Pangani River Basin as well also to sustain the life of the community found in the catchment. &#xD;
The need of more precise models for LULC projection increases worldwide but also the spatial-temporal &#xD;
LULC Dynamics (LULCD)brought about by quickening pace in urbanization, population growth, &#xD;
agricultural activities, and other   human economic activities has altered the surface of the earth including &#xD;
The Right Upper Kikuletwa Sub catchment, hence the concern regarding sustainable management of &#xD;
environment and land resources has been increasing too. The process of comparing models for more &#xD;
accurately projection and understanding the significant dynamics of these LULC changes is essential but &#xD;
not limited for successful planning and decision making, land management, resource allocation, &#xD;
environmental conservation and protection, hydrological studies and sustainable development &#xD;
applications. &#xD;
In order to achieve the specific objectives of this study, the Landsat (satellite images) data for 1993,2006 &#xD;
and 2018, DEM and other social -economic data were collected, processed then Land use/Cover &#xD;
classification under supervised classification, accuracy assessment and independent variables preparation &#xD;
was done through Remote sensing and GIS techniques using ArcMap 10.8, QGIS 3.28 and Google earth. &#xD;
Land Use/Cover simulation and projection was carried out in Terrset Geospatial Monitoring and &#xD;
Modelling System (Terrsetsoftware2020) through embedded Land Change Modeler (LCM)and CA&#xD;
Markov Models under given scenarios. Comparison of two Models (LCM and CA-Markov) and &#xD;
investigation of historical and future LULC Dynamics (LULCD) was done utilizing the Classified LULC &#xD;
maps, simulated LULC map and Projected LULC maps. However, in carrying the analysis, ArcMap, and &#xD;
Terrsetsoftware2020 were used. &#xD;
In the Accuracy assessment of Classified LULC by using Kappa Index, it was shown that all three &#xD;
classified LULC map had high accuracy with Kappa Index of 0.91,0.95,0.95 for 1993,2006 and2018 &#xD;
respectively. In comparison analysis between LCM and CA-Markov by MCPI the CA-Markov shows to &#xD;
be stronger than LCM Model for LULC Projection in this Sub catchment by having Standard Kappa (KST) &#xD;
of 0.7463 compared to 0.649 of LCM Model. &#xD;
Results of this study revealed that, based on historical to future LULC Dynamics (1993-2054), the trend &#xD;
shows that Agricultural land and Urban/Built up categories of LULC experienced and expected to &#xD;
experience increasing trend with area increase from 92.99Km2 &#xD;
308.11 Km2 by 2054 for Agricultural &#xD;
land and 25.16 Km2-147.64Km2 by 2054 or Urban/Buil up. Forest land and Range land shows decreasing &#xD;
trend from 272.58Km2-113.89Km2 by 2054 ,296.82Km2-124.59Km2 by 2054,12.67Km2 -1.92Km2 by &#xD;
2054 for Forestland, Range land and Ice surface respectively. While Bare/Barren land shows decrease and &#xD;
then increase range from 69.07Km2- 60.74Km2-71.16Km2 by 1993,2006 and 2054 respectively. &#xD;
In Analysis of Change Annual Rate(CR) of each LULC Class, based on about 12years interval, for the &#xD;
whole study time(1993-2054)it was shown that the change rate vary whereby for Agricultural land varied &#xD;
between +0.85 to  +6.51Km2/Year, Urban/Built up (+1.02 to +3.22 Km2/Year),Forestland (-1.42 to -4.18 &#xD;
Km2/Year),Bare/Barren land (-0.64 to +0.53 Km2/Year),Rangeland (-0.48 to -6.92 Km2/Year),Ice surface &#xD;
(-0.78 to 0.00 Km2/Year) and Water bodies(-0.01 to 0.18 Km2/Year).The persistence analysis indicated &#xD;
that for Historical(1993-2018) LULC Dynamics the persistence area  was noticed to be 118.52Km2 for &#xD;
Rangeland,Agriculturalland(57.77Km2),Bare/Barrenland(44.10Km2),Waterbodies(0.01Km2),Urban/Buil&#xD;
tup(9.10Km2),Forest land(169.56Km2),Ice surface (1.94Km2).Future(2054)LULC Dynamics expected &#xD;
persistenceshowsAgriculturalland(194.98Km2),Urban/Builtup(62.96Km2),Rangeland(118.85Km2),Wat&#xD;
erbodies(0.83Km2),Bare/Barren land(66.5Km2),Ice surface(1.65Km2) and Forest land(112.1Km2). -Markov by MCPI &#xD;
over LCM model. However, it gave out insight regarding significant LULC Dynamics at the Sub &#xD;
catchment which would be incorporated into planning, decision making, catchment management program &#xD;
and various hydrological studies in the catchment. In order to secure sustainable functions of this sub &#xD;
catchment, it is recommended to carry out flood and hydrological resilience studies and implement &#xD;
Integrated Watershed Management.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost:8081/jspui/handle/123456789/20538</guid>
      <dc:date>2024-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

